List Jana Pawła II (pragmatyka, struktura, język)

Jerzy Biniewicz




Abstract

The experience of time passing , perceived both individually and as a group, being a psychological fact and contributing to complex cultural relations, determines historical knowledge (the interpretation of historical processes and definition of facts). We should remember, when we talk about the interpretation of time, understood as the assessment of historical facts, allowing for the integration of a given society around an idea, around va- lues constituting their cohesion and, to a considerable extent, determining its relations with the outer world, that it is always a product of social discourse, grinding views, a se- arch for such a vision of the futurę with which at least the groups most important to a community’s functioning would identify.The letter of John Paul II addressed to the nations of Poland and Ukrainę, in which the question of evaluating the tragic events in Volyn during World War II was brought up, is the subject of this analysis. The article attempts to answer the question (taking into consi- deration the complexity of the process shaping mutual neighbourly relations) how the Pope endeavours to attain his objective, which is to encourage Poles and Ukrainians to re- concile and to reject the past for the sake of tasks facing united Europę.The Pope’s letter is undoubtedly a speech realized with the use of lexical and stylistic means typical for religious language. At the same time, the analysis shows that certain elements of the letter are typical for the language of politics.The Pope’s text in the world of freedom and pluralism, where numerous political sub- jects make contact with society by means of varied language, escaping explicit assessment, is marked by an expressive, easily recognizable description of reality and ans- wers a common need (the Pope feels responsible for the word, and builds a speaker-reci- pient relationship in order for the reader to become the subject capable of creating the world), thus he is appreciated and noticeable in the world of mass culture.

Keywords:

letter, time, stylistics

Biniewicz J., 2005, Retoryka wystąpienia parlamentów Polski i Ukrainy. — Ogród nauk filologicznych, Księga Jubileuszowa poświęcona profesorowi Stanisławowi Kochmanowi, red. M. Balowski, W. Chlebda, Opole.

Bralczyk J.,1996, Język na sprzedaż, Warszawa .Bralczyk J.,2003, O języku polskiej polityki lat osiemdziesiątych i dziewięćdziesiątych, Warszawa.

Ceglińska A.,2000, Piękno papieskiego słowa (O stylu encyklik Jana Pawła II), Łódź. Cohen J., 1986, Teoria figury, „Pamiętnik Literacki”, z. 4.Kałkowska A., 1993, Językowe wykładniki pragmatycznej funkcji listu, „Stylistyka”, s. 187-204.

Korolko M„ 1985, Wstęp. — P. Skarga, Kazania Sejmowe i Wezwanie do pokuty obywatelów Korony Polskiej i Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego, Warszawa.

Korolko M„ 1990, Sztuka retoryki, Warszawa.

Pattaro G„ 1988, Pojmowanie czasu w chrześcijaństwie. - Czas w kulturze, oprać, i wstęp A. Zajączkowski, Warszawa.

Skubalanka T., 1984, Historyczna stylistyka języka polskiego. Przekroje, Wrocław.

Skwarczyńska S., 1975, Wokół teorii listu. - S. Skwarczyńska, Pomiędzy historią a teorią literatury, Warszawa.

Szagun D., 2006, Czas historyczny a czas sakralny w „Melodiach biblijnych” Kornela Ujejskiego. — Język a kultura, Czas-Język-Kultura, red. A. Dąbrowska, A. Nowakowska, t. 19, Wrocław.

Tokarski R., 2001, Słownictwo jako interpretacja świata. - Współczesny język polski, Lublin.

Wojtak M., 2003, Gatunki prasowe, Lublin.

Ziomek J., 1990, Retoryka opisowa, Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków.

Published
2021-02-19

Cited by

Biniewicz, J. (2021). List Jana Pawła II (pragmatyka, struktura, język). Stylistyka, 16, 393–404. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3635

Authors

Jerzy Biniewicz 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2007 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.