Gatunki tekstów odnoszących się do przyszłości

Bożena Żmigrodzka




Abstract

The paper deals with a group of text genres in contemporary Polish, like prognoza (fo- recast), przepowiednia, proroctwo (prophecy), augury (wróżba) and horoskop (horoscope). These genres are deeply set in culture and their specifity is perfectly identified in so- cial linguistic conciousness. The most generał definition of the five genres can be as fol- lows: „I know that Y will happen/1 say this because I think you want to know, what will hapen”. The two characteristic features of these genres are: 1) all events presented are si- tuated in the futurę, after the act of lingual performance of these text; 2) primarily infor- mational character ot texts.All these genres, being assertives referring to the futurę, can be called „predictional genres”. Even though they have their roots in magie and religion, nowadays they func- tion also in other parts of social life, i.e. in science and popular culture. Prophecy, horo- scope and augury in magie orastrology have mostly informatic and therapeutic functions. When they occur in popular culture, the ludic function plays a part, and the informatical funtion is suspended.

Keywords:

predictional genres, future, forecast, prophecy, augury, horoscope

Czakański T., 2000, Proroctwo, „Gość Niedzielny” nr 28 (cyt. za www.opoka.org.pl).

Gajda S., 1993, Gatunkowe wzorce wypowiedzi. - Encyklopedia kultury polskiej XX wieku. T. 2: Współczesny język polski, red. J. Bartmiński, Wrocław, s. 245-258.

Kotarbiński T., 1961, Walory dobrego planu, „Nauka Polska” 1961, nr 1 (cyt. za Rolbiecki 1970).

Krzyżanowski J., red, 1965, Słownik folkloru polskiego, Warszawa:

Rolbiecki W., 1970, Przewidywanie przyszłości. Elementy prognozologii, Warszawa.

Searle J.R., 1999, Umysł, język społeczeństwo. Filozofia i rzeczywistość, tłum D. Cieśla, Warszawa.

Słomka A., 2002, Prorok, „Tygodnik Powszechny” nr 36(2774), 8 września 2002.

Świderkówna A., 2001, Rozmowy o Biblii, Warszawa.

Wierzbicka A., 1983, Genry mowy. - Tekst i zdanie, red. T. Dobrzyńska, E. Janus, Wrocław, s. 125-137.

Wojtak M., 1999, Stylistyka tekstów użytkowych- wybrane zagadnienia. W: Język. Teoria - dydaktyka, red. B. Greszczuk, Rzeszów, s. 253-263.

Zeliaś A., 1997, Teoria prognozy, Warszawa.

Zuberbier A., red., 1989, Słownik teologiczny, t. 2, Katowice.

Wykaz cytowanych słowników

ISJP - Inny słownik języka polskiego, red. M. Bańko, t. 1-2. Warszawa 2000.

SJPD - Słownik języka polskiego, red. W. Doroszewski, t. 1-11, Warszawa 1958-1969.

SJPS - Słownik języka polskiego, red. M. Szymczak, t. 1-3, Warszawa 1978-1981.

SWJP - Słownik współczesnego języka polskiego, red. Dunaj, Warszawa 1996.

USJP - Uniwersalny słownik języka polskiego, red. S. Dubisz, t. 1-4, Warszawa 2003.

Published
2021-02-21

Cited by

Żmigrodzka, B. (2021). Gatunki tekstów odnoszących się do przyszłości. Stylistyka, 16, 531–540. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3651

Authors

Bożena Żmigrodzka 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2007 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.