Nation, Social Class and Style: a Comparison of the Humour of Britain and America

Christie Davies




Abstract

Historically a much greater range of styles of literary humour were to be found in Bri[1]t sun than in the United States because Bi „.n was a much more hierarchical society with a divined elite and an aristocratic as well as a bourgeois aesthetic. In America there was a single dominant class, that of independent farmers and the businessmen and professional people of medium sized cities whose optimistic, egalitarian, moralistic, culture restricted the range of styles an aspiring American humorous writer could use. This restnctiveness remained long after American had become the world’s leading, richest and most techno[1]logically advanced economy. British humour alone was able to use styles that valued de[1]tachment from conventional morality and also took inequality for granted and hence devi[1]sed torms of aggressive mockery that could be directed downwards. British humour was also able to emplo> a greater reach of allusw eness, vocabulary and sophistication than was possible in America. It was the rise of Jev sh humour in America from a new initially immigrant population that valued things of the intellect for their own sake and which had also mastered the arts of detachment that enabled American literary humour to achieve a comparable degree of vanety and sophistication to that of Britain in the course of the twentith century.

Keywords:

America, Britain, class, cruelty, culture, hierarchy, moralism, sophistication, style

Attardo Salvatore, 2001, Humorous Texts: a Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis, New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
  Google Scholar

Belloc Hilaire, 1939 (1930), The Garden Party in Cautionary Verses, The Collected Humorous Poems of H Belloc, London, Duckworth.
  Google Scholar

Bloom James D., 2003, Gravity Fails: The Comic Jewish Shaping of Modern America. Westport, Praeger.
  Google Scholar

Brandon Ruth and Christie Davies, 1973, Wrongful Imprisonment, London, Allen and Unwin.
  Google Scholar

Carroll Lewis, 1%5, The Works of Lewis Carroll, Feltham, Spring.
  Google Scholar

Davies Christie, 1990, Ethnic Humor around the World: a Comparative Analysis, Bloomington, Indiana, Indiana, U.P.
  Google Scholar

Davies Christie, 2002, The Mirth of Nations, New Brunswick, N.J. Transaction.
  Google Scholar

Davies Christie, 2004, The Strange Death of Moral Britain, New Brunswick NJ, Transaction.
  Google Scholar

Dickens Charles (ed. Bernard N. Schilling), 1959, The Comic World of Charles Dickens, London, John Murray.
  Google Scholar

Gross Milt, 1927, Nize Baby, London, Alfred A Knopf.
  Google Scholar

Grossmith George and Weedon, 1994 (1889). The Diary of a Nobody, Ware, Wordsworth.
  Google Scholar

Harte Bret, 1887 (18o9), The Outcasts of Poker Flat in The Select Works of Bret Harte in prose and poetry, London, Chatto and Windus: 15-27.
  Google Scholar

Johnston Charles, 1912, Why the World Laughs, New York, Harper.
  Google Scholar

Kipling Rudyard, 1994, The Works of Rudyard Kipling, Ware, Wordsworth Poetry Library Lewis Sinclair, 1950 (1922), Babbitt, New York, New American Library.
  Google Scholar

Lewis Sinclair, 1954, Unpublished Introduction to Babbitt: 23-32 and Our Friend, H.G.: 158-166 in Hurry E Maule and Melville H.Cane (eds) The Man from Main Street, London Heinemann: 23-32.
  Google Scholar

Lipset Seymour Martin, Reinhard Bendix, 1967, Social Mobility in Industrial Society, Berkely, University of California Press.
  Google Scholar

Mencken H. L. 1982, A Mencken Chrestomathv, New York, Vintage.
  Google Scholar

Mikes George, 1980, English Humour for Beginners, London, Andre Deutsch.
  Google Scholar

Rattigan Terence, 1982 (1946), The Winslow Boy n Rattigan Plays I, London Methuen.
  Google Scholar

Ross Leonard Q (Leo Calvin Rosten), 1944 (1937), The Education of Hyman Kaplan, London Constable.
  Google Scholar

Runyon Damon, 19JO (1937-8), Runyon on Broadway, London, Constable.
  Google Scholar

Sak (H. H. Monro), 1930, The Complete Short Stories of Saki, London, Bodley Head.
  Google Scholar

Twain Mark, 1897, Mark Twain s Choice Works, London, Chatto and Windus.
  Google Scholar

Twain Mark (ed. Victor Doyno), 1983, Selected Writings of an American Skeptic, New York, Prometheus.
  Google Scholar

Warner W. Lloyd, 1952, The structure of American Life, Edinburgh, Edinburgh UP.
  Google Scholar

Warner W. Lloyd, Marchia Meeker, Kenneth Eells, 1949, Social Class in America, Chica go, Science Research Associates.
  Google Scholar

Waugh Evelyn, 1934 (1928), Decline and Fall, London, Penguin.
  Google Scholar

Wells H. G., 1928 (1910), The History of Mr. Polly in Four Comedies, London, Ernest Benn.
  Google Scholar

West Nathanael, (Nathan Wallenstein Weinstein), 1975 (1934), A Cool Million or The Di smantling of Lemuel Pitkin in The Collected Works of Nathanael West, Harmond sworth, Penguin.
  Google Scholar

Wiener Martin J., 2004, English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850-1980. Cambridge, Cambridge UP.
  Google Scholar

Wilde Oscar, 1979 (1887), Lord Arthur Sav lie’s Crime in Oscar Wilde, Complete Shorter Fiction, Oxford, Oxford U.P.
  Google Scholar

Websites
  Google Scholar

Alison, Lincoln http://www.socialaflairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000570.php (essay on Belloc).
  Google Scholar

Gilbert, William Schwenk and Arthur Sullivan, 1885, The Mikado,
  Google Scholar

http://diamona.boisestate.edu/gas/mikado/html/index.html
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2006-12-30

Cited by

Davies, C. (2006). Nation, Social Class and Style: a Comparison of the Humour of Britain and America. Stylistyka, 15, 99–118. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3884

Authors

Christie Davies 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.