Konvekcii kak osnova ispolneniâ socialʹnyh i kommunikativnyh rolej v delovom dialogičeskom obŝenii
Mariâ V. Koltunova
Abstract
Conventional behavior in business communication characterizes complex obligatory control speech norms, pragmatic restrictions and prohibitions, complicated and strengthened
by social behavior rules and norms. Regulation information density and portioning information, cognitive process control, on the one side, and coordination mode of attitudes
and emotions coordination, on the second, organize the interaction processes in business dialogs. They structured and organized communication according the purposes of
participants. Official interaction zone claim more strong control to observe conventional rules and norms then nonofficial and half-officia! ones. They structured and organized communication and uses as a basis of producing communicative and social roles in business communication. It does realize by illocutionary stereotype schemes of genre situational script.
Keywords:
conventions, social and communication roles, expectations, scheme of illocutionary forceReferences
Антинескул. O. Л. , Двинянинова Г., C., 1998, Статусные роли говорящих и x речь. Учеб. пособие, Пермь.
Баранов A. H. , Крейдаин Г. Е., 1992, Иллокутивное вынуждение в структуре диалога, “Вопросы языкознания”, №4.
Борисова И. H., 2003, Русский разговорный дишог: зоны толерантного и нетолерантного общения. - Филологические и лингвокультурологические проблемы толерантности, Екатеринбург, с. 371-397.
Винокур T. Г., 1993, Говорящий и слушающий, Москва: Наука.
Грайс Г.П., 1985, Логика и речевое общение. - Новое в зарубежной лингвистике, вып. 16. Лингвистическая прагматика, Москва.
Ипполитова H.A., Князева O.IO, Савова М.Р., 2004, Русский язык и культура речи, Москва.
Крьісин Л.П., 1976, Речевое общение и социадьные роли говорящих. - Со- цишьно-лингвистинеские исследование, Москва.
Михэдьская А.К., 1996, Основы риторики. Мысль и слово, Москва.
Стросон П.Ф., 1986, Намерение и конвенция в речевых актах. - Новое в зарубежной лингвистике, Москва.
Сухих C.A., Зеленская B.B., 1998, Прагматнгвистическое моделирование коммуникативного процесса, Краснодар.
Тарасов Е.Ф., 1977, Место речевого общенш e коммуникативном акте. - Соц- иачыно-кулытурная специфика речевого общенш, MoCKBa.
Шевченод E.B., 2002, Делоеое общение и профессиональные коммуникации. - Житниковские чтенш. Русский язык как государственный. Динамика и перспективы. Материмы Всероссийской научной конференции, Челябинск ЧєлГу, c. 105-107.
Gerhardt U., 1 97 1 , Rollenanalyse ais kritische Soziologie, Neuwind: Luchverhand.
Merton R. K . , 1 957, The role-set Problems in sociologica/ theory, "British Journal of Sociology", vol . 8 , 1 957.
Popitz H., 1 967, Der Begriff der sozialen rolle ais Element der soziologischen Theorie, Tubingen.
Authors
Mariâ V. KoltunovaStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Stylistyka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Mariâ V. Koltunova, Ritual Speech Acts in Social Communicatio , Stylistyka: Vol. 11 (2002): Stylistics and Poetics
