The physical and psychological characteristics expressed in phraseological units that contain religious components in the Serbian language

Nataša S. Vulović Emonts


https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-3748

Abstract

The paper discusses ways of expressing emotions and psychic conditions in phraseological units that contain religious components (душа, бог, ђаво (враг), светац, анђео, Мајка Божија, поп, etc.) like, for example: леп као анђео, ружан као ђаво, искрен као Мајка божија, врага (ђавола) би на леду потковао, расте као да га ђаволи за уши вуку. The author carries out a semantic analysis of phraseological units, including the determination of the main concepts of a person’s physical characteristics (beauty, ugliness, old age, thinness, height, stiffness) and psychological ones (goodness, evil, cunning, sincerity, laziness, etc). Other sets of methods used in this study comprise a componential, as well as historical and etymological analyses of phraseological units. The aim is also to display how much this part of Serbian phraseology reflects Judeo-Christian cultural and historical heritage. Apart from the above-mentioned global phraseological meanings, the tables provided in the paper contain the features of positive and negative connotation, qualification of physical characteristics attitude of the speaker (derisive, derogatory, humorous, etc.), as well as the stylistic aspects: irony (агнец божији, изигравати свеца, не дати Богу штапа да убије врага etc), oximoron (живе мошти), paradox (посветио се к’о Гојко у ћивоту). Phraseological units expressing characteristics of beauty and goodness, as well as honesty, are the only ones having a positive connotation, while the negative one prevails, particularly derogatory qualification of meaning.

Keywords:

phraseological units, religious components, physical characteristics, psychological characteristics, stylistic

Литература
  Google Scholar

Вуловић Н., 2015, Српска фразеологија и религија, Београд: Институт за српски језик САНУ.
  Google Scholar

Вуловић Н., 2016, Експресивност фразеолошких јединица с компонентом ђаво у српском језику. – Научни састанак слависта у Вукове дане 45/1, Београд: Међународни славистички центар, с. 381–393.
  Google Scholar

Енц. правосл., 2002, Енциклопедија православља, Београд: Савремена адми нистрација.
  Google Scholar

Караџић В., 1849, Српске народне пословице и друге различне као оне у обичај узете ријечи, Беч: Штампарија Јерменскога манастира.
  Google Scholar

Ковачевић М., 2015, Стилистика и граматика стилских фигура, Београд: Јасен.
  Google Scholar

Мршевић-Радовић Д., 2008, Фразеологија и национална култура, Београд: Друштво за српски језик и књижевност Србије.
  Google Scholar

Оташевић Ђ., 2012, Фразеолошки речник српског језика, Нови Сад: Прометеј.
  Google Scholar

РМС 1–6, Речник српскохрватског књижевног језика (I–VI), 1967–1976, Нови Сад – Загреб: Матица српска – Матица хрватска.
  Google Scholar

РСАНУ 1–21, Речник српскохрватског књижевног и народног језика, 1959–,Београд: Институт за српски језик САНУ.
  Google Scholar

РСЈ, Речник српскога језика, 2007, Нови Сад: Матица српска.
  Google Scholar

Стошић Љ., 2006, Речник црквених појмова, Београд: Завод за уџбенике.
  Google Scholar

Matešić J., 1982, Frazeološki rječnik hrvatskoga ili srpskog jezika, Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
  Google Scholar

References
  Google Scholar

Vulović N., 2015, Srpska frazeologija i religija, Beograd: Institut za srpski jezik SANU.
  Google Scholar

Vulović N., 2016, Ekspresivnost frazeoloških jedinica s komponentom đavo u srpskom jeziku, Naučni sastanak slavista u Vukove dane 45/1, Beograd: Međunarodni slavistički centar, s. 381–393.
  Google Scholar

Enc. pravosl., 2002, Enciklopedija pravoslavlja, Beograd: Savremena administracija.
  Google Scholar

Karadžić V., 1849, Srpske narodne poslovice i druge različne kao one u običaj uzete riječi, Beč: Štamparija Jermenskoga manastira.
  Google Scholar

Kovačević M., 2015, Stilistika i gramatika stilskih figura, Beograd: Jasen.
  Google Scholar

Mršević-Radović D., 2008, Frazeologija i nacionalna kultura, Beograd: Društvo za srpski jezik i književnost Srbije.
  Google Scholar

Otašević Đ., 2012, Frazeološki rečnik srpskog jezika, Novi Sad: Prometej.
  Google Scholar

RMS 1–6, Rečnik srpskohrvatskog književnog jezika (I–VI), 1967–1976, Novi Sad –Zagreb: Matica srpska – Matica hrvatska.
  Google Scholar

RSANU 1–21, Rečnik srpskohrvatskog književnog i narodnog jezika, 1959–, Beograd: Institut za srpski jezik SANU.
  Google Scholar

RSJ, Rečnik srpskoga jezika, 2007, Novi Sad: Matica srpska.
  Google Scholar

Stošić Lj., 2006, Rečnik crkvenih pojmova, Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike.
  Google Scholar


Published
2021-12-28

Cited by

Vulović Emonts, N. S. . (2021). The physical and psychological characteristics expressed in phraseological units that contain religious components in the Serbian language. Stylistyka, 30, 297–305. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka30.2021.16

Authors

Nataša S. Vulović Emonts 
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-3748

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2021 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.