Exploring basic hope as a mediator between attitudes towards religion and psychological well-being among Anglicans

Dariusz Krok

Instytut Psychologii Uniwersytetu Opolskiego

Abstrakt

Celem niniejszego badania jest sprawdzenie mediacyjnej roli nadziei podstawowej w związku postaw wobec religii z dobrostanem psychicznym w próbie Anglikanów. Ponieważ wcześniejsze badania wskazywały na bliskie związki między religijnością, nadzieją i dobrostanem, powyższe założenie jest wysoce prawdopodobne. W badaniu wzięło udział sto siedemdziesiąt sześć osób (89 kobiet i 87 mężczyzn). Wszyscy byli członkami Kościoła Anglikańskiego i wypełnili trzy kwestionariusze: Skalę Przekonań Postkrytycznych (PCBS), Skalę Dobrostanu Psychicznego (PWB) oraz Inwentarz Podstawowej Nadziei (BHI-12). Wyniki wykazały, że wszystkie cztery postawy wobec religii były związane z nadzieją podstawową: ortodoksja i wtórna ufność były pozytywnie związane z nadzieją podstawową, podczas gdy zewnętrzna krytyka i relatywizm były negatywnie powiązane. Ponadto, nadzieja podstawowa była pozytywnie związana z dobrostanem psychicznym. Główne odkrycie pokazało, że nadzieja podstawowa okazała się pośredniczyć w związkach pomiędzy czterema postawami wobec religii a dobrostanem psychicznym wśród Anglikanów. Podsumowując, wyniki badań podkreślają ważną rolę nadziei, która wydaje się być kluczowa dla rozwoju przekonań religijnych i dobrostanu.

The current study examines the mediating role of basic hope in the relationship of attitudes towards religion with psychological well-being in a sample of Anglicans. Because previous research has indicated close associations among religiosity, hope and well-being, the aforementioned assumption is highly plausible. A total of 176 participants (89 women and 87 men) took part in this study. All were members of the Church of England who completed three questionnaires: the Post-Critical Belief Scale (PCBS), the Psychological Well-Being (PWB) and the Basic Hope Inventory (BHI-12). The results demonstrated that all four attitudes towards religion were associated with basic hope: orthodoxy and second naiveté were positively related to basic hope, while external critique and relativism were negatively related. In addition, basic hope was positively associated with psychological well-being. The main finding showed that basic hope turned out to mediate the relationships between the four attitudes towards religion and psychological well-being among Anglicans. Taken together, the findings highlight the important role of hope, which seems vital to the development of people’s religious beliefs and well-being.

Słowa kluczowe:

attitudes to religion, basic hope, psychological well-being, Anglicanism, postawy wobec religii, nadzieja podstawowa, dobrostan psychiczny, anglikanizm

Abdel-Khalek Ahmed M. 2007. “Religiosity, happiness, health, and psychopathology in a probability sample of Muslim adolescents”. Mental Health, Religion and Culture 10 (6): 571–583.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670601034547   Google Scholar

Cappellen Patty Van, Toth-Gauthier Maria, Saroglou Vassilis, Fredrickson Barbara L. 2016. “Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive emotions”. Journal of Happiness Studies 17 (2): 485–505.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9605-5   Google Scholar

Cohen Adam B. 2002. “The importance of spirituality in well-being for Jews and Christians”. Journal of Happiness Studies 3: 287–310.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020656823365   Google Scholar

Cohen Adam B., Hall Daniel E. 2009. “Existential beliefs, social satisfaction, and well-being among Catholic, Jewish, and Protestant older adults”. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 19: 39–54.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610802471088   Google Scholar

Cohen Adam B., Johnson Kathryn A.. 2017. “The relation between religion and well-being”. Applied Research in Quality of Life 12(3): 533–547.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9475-6   Google Scholar

Counted Victor, Pargament Kenneth I., Bechara Andrea Ortega, Joynt Shaun, Cowden Richard G. 2022. “Hope and well-being in vulnerable contexts during the COVID-19 pandemic: Does religious coping matter?” The Journal of Positive Psychology 17 (1): 70–81.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1832247   Google Scholar

Dezutter Jessie, Soenens Bart, Luyckx Koen, Bruyneel Sabrina, Vansteenkiste Maarten, Duriez Bart, Hutsebaut Dirk. 2008. The role of religion in death attitudes: Distinguishing between religious belief and style of processing religious contents. Death Studies 33 (1): 73–92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180802494289   Google Scholar

Duriez Bart, Dezutter Jessie, Neyrinck Bart, Hutsebaut Dirk. 2007. “An introduction to the Post-Critical Belief Scale: Internal structure and external relationships”. Psyke and Logos 28 (2): 767–793.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v28i2.8399   Google Scholar

Duriez Bart, Fontaine Johnny, Hutsebaut Dirk. 2000. “A further elaboration of the post-critical belief scale: Evidence for the existence of four different approaches toward religion in Flanders-Belgium”. Psychologica Belgica 40: 153–181.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.961   Google Scholar

Duriez Bart, Soenens Bart, Hutsebaut Dirk. 2005. “Introducing the shortened Post-Critical Belief Scale”. Personality and Individual Differences 38 (4): 851–857.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.06.009   Google Scholar

Duriez Bart, Soenens Bart. 2006. “Religiosity, moral attitudes and moral competence: A critical investigation of the religiosity-morality relation”. International Journal of Behavioral Development 30 (1): 76–83.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406062127   Google Scholar

Erikson Erik. 1963. Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
  Google Scholar

Erikson Erik. 1982. The life cycle completed. New York: Norton.
  Google Scholar

Esfandiyar Baljani, Javad Khashabi, Elham Amanpour, Neda Azimi. 2011. “Relationship between spiritual well-being, religion, and hope among patients with cancer”. Journal of Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery 17 (3): 27–37.
  Google Scholar

Faul Franz, Erdfelder Edgar, Buchner Axel, Lang Albert-Georg. 2009. “Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses”. Behavior Research Methods 41: 1149–1160.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149   Google Scholar

Gull Mubashir, Nizami Naheed. 2015. “Comparative study of hope and psychological well-being among the parents of physically and intellectually disabled children”. International Journal of Modern Social Sciences 4 (42): 143–152.
  Google Scholar

Hasson-Ohayon Ilanit, Braun Michal, Galinsky Daliah, Baider Lea. 2009. “Religiosity and hope: A path for women coping with a diagnosis of breast cancer”. Psychosomatics 50 (5): 525–533.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(09)70846-1   Google Scholar

Hoogeveen Suzanne, Sarafoglou Alexandra, Aczel Balazs, Aditya Yonathan, Alayan Alexandra J., Allen Peter J., Altay Sacha et al. 2022. “A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being”. Religion, Brain and Behavior 1, 1–47.
  Google Scholar

Hutsebaut D. 1996. “Post-Critical Belief: A new approach of the religious attitude problem”. Journal of Empirical Theology 9: 48–66.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157092596X00132   Google Scholar

Hutsebaut D. 2000. “Post-Critical belief scales”. Journal of Empirical Theology 13 (2): 19–28.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157092500X00083   Google Scholar

Hutsebaut Dirk, Duriez Bart. 2001. “Approaches to religion and the moods and emotions associated with religion”. Journal of Empirical Theology 14 (2): 75–84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157092501X00091   Google Scholar

Jankowski Peter J., Sandage Steven J., Wang David C., Crabtree Sarah. 2022. “Virtues as Mediators of the associations between Religious/Spiritual Commitment and Well-being”. Applied Research in Quality of Life 1: 1–25.
  Google Scholar

Kardas Ferhat, Cam Zekeriya, Eskisu Mustafa, Gelibolu Sedat. 2019. “Gratitude, hope, optimism and life satisfaction as predictors of psychological well-being”. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 19 (82): 81–100.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.82.5   Google Scholar

Koenig Harold G. 2012. “Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications”. International Scholarly Research Network. ISRN Psychiatry 1: 1–33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730   Google Scholar

Krok Dariusz. 2016. The importance of meaning in life as a mediator of religiousness and hope in late adolescents. In Religiosity: Psychological perspectives, individual differences and health benefits. Ed. Rochelle Cooper, 15-30. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  Google Scholar

Nasr Seyyed H. 1996. Religion and the Order of Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195108231.001.0001   Google Scholar

Plakas Sotirios, Boudioni Markella, Fouka Georgia, Taket Ann. 2011. “The role of religiosity as a coping resource for relatives of critically ill patients in Greece”. Contemporary Nurse 39 (1): 95–105.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2011.39.1.95   Google Scholar

Rahman Khaista, Khalily Muhammad Tahir, Akram Muhammad. 2021. “The adaptation and validation of the New Indices of Religious Orientation Revised Scale”. Foundation University Journal of Psychology 5 (1): 126–135.
  Google Scholar

Ramsay Jonathan E., Tong Eddie M. W., Chowdhury Avijit, Ho Moon-Ho R. 2019. “Teleological explanation and positive emotion serially mediate the effect of religion on well‐being”. Journal of Personality 87 (3): 676–689.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12425   Google Scholar

Rose Andrew H., Rose Jennifer R., Miller Rick B., Dyer W. Justin. 2018. “Exploring hope as a mediator between religiosity and depression in adolescents”. Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought 37 (3): 239–253.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2018.1488646   Google Scholar

Ryff Carol D., Keyes Corey Lee M. 1995. “The structure of psychological well-being revisited”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (4): 719–727.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719   Google Scholar

Sharma Swati, Singh Kamlesh. 2019. “Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive virtues”. Journal of Religion and Health 58 (1): 119–131.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0559-5   Google Scholar

Sheldon Kennon M.. 2006. “Catholic guilt? Comparing Catholics’ and Protestants’ religious motivations”. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 16: 209–223.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1603_5   Google Scholar

Shen Megan Johnson, Yelderman Logan A., Haggard Megan C., Rowatt Wade C.. 2013. “Disentangling the belief in God and cognitive rigidity/flexibility components of religiosity to predict racial and value-violating prejudice: A Post-Critical Belief Scale analysis”. Personality and Individual Differences 54 (3): 389–395.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.008   Google Scholar

Śliwak Jacek, Zarzycka Beata. 2012. “The interplay between post-critical beliefs and anxiety: An exploratory study in a Polish sample”. Journal of Religion and Health 51 (2): 419–430.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-010-9367-2   Google Scholar

Snyder Charles R. 2004. “Hope and depression: A light in the darkness”. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 23 (3): 347–351.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.3.347.35458   Google Scholar

Snyder Charles R., Sigmon David R., Feldman David B.. 2002. “Hope for the sacred and vice versa: Positive goal-directed thinking and religion”. Psychological Inquiry 13 (3): 234–238.
  Google Scholar

Trzebiński Jerzy, Zięba Mariusz. 2004. „Basic hope as a world-view: an outline of a concept”. Polish Psychological Bulletin 35 (3): 173–182.
  Google Scholar

Wulff David M. 1991. Psychology of religion: classic and contemporary views. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2022-12-28

Cited By / Share

Krok, D. (2022). Exploring basic hope as a mediator between attitudes towards religion and psychological well-being among Anglicans. Studia Oecumenica, 22, 219–236. https://doi.org/10.25167/so.4876

Autorzy

Dariusz Krok 

Statystyki

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


Licencja

Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Studia Oecumenica

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Studia Oecumenica

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0

Licencja oraz prawa autorskie autorzy przekazują wydawcy, którym jest Redakcji Wydawnictw WT UO.