Psychosocial determinants of religious/denominational conversion: a person–environment fit perspective

Dariusz Krok

Instytut Psychologii Uniwersytetu Opolskiego

Ivana Olecká

Palacky University Olomouc, Sts. Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology, Department of Social Work with Children and Youth

Abstract

Religious or denominational conversion is a complex process that involves various psychosocial factors. One theoretical framework that has been utilized to comprehend the determinants of religious conversion is the person-environment fit model. This study examines the role of personal and socio-cultural factors that play a significant role in conversion processes within a person-environment fit perspective. The analysis demonstrates that individuals are more likely to convert to a new religion or denomination when they perceive a good fit between their personal and socio-cultural characteristics and the characteristics of the religious or denominational environment. Personal factors that may influence the decision to convert include: personality traits, values, beliefs, and thinking styles, while socio-cultural factors comprise: socialization, familial and cultural norms and standards, and social integration processes. Moreover, both categories of factors interact in the conversion process, influencing potential decisions to convert to varying degrees. When an individual’s religious beliefs, values, and norms align with those of a newly encountered group, they are more likely to identify with the group's goals and mission.

Schlagworte:

religion, conversion, religious changes, person–environment approach, functional fit

Bahçekapili Hasan G., Yilmaz Onurcan. 2017. „The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style”. Personality and Individual Differences 117: 267–272.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.013   Google Scholar

Buxant Coralie, Saroglou Vassilis, Casalfiore Stefania, Christians Louis-Léon. 2007. „Cognitive and emotional characteristics of New Religious Movement members: New questions and data on the mental health issue”. Mental Health, Religion and Culture 10 (3): 219–238.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13694670600621506   Google Scholar

Castaño Álvaro, Bélanger Jocelyn J., Moyano Manuel. 2022. „Cult conversion from the perspective of families: Implications for prevention and psychological intervention”. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 14 (1): 148–160.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000410   Google Scholar

Cheung Millissa F., To Wai Ming. 2019. „An extended model of value-attitude-behavior to explain Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior”. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 50: 145–153.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.006   Google Scholar

Cowan Douglas E.. (2014). Conversion to New Religious Movements. W The Oxford Handbook of Religious Conversion. Red. Lewis R. Rambo, Charles E. Farhadian, 687–705. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar

Duriez Bart, Dezutter Jessie, Neyrinck Bart, Hutsebaut Dirk. 2007. “An introduction to the Post-Critical Belief Scale: Internal structure and external relationships”. Psyke and Logos 28 (2): 767–793.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v28i2.8399   Google Scholar

Duriez Bart, Fontaine Johnny, Hutsebaut Dirk. 2000. “A further elaboration of the post-critical belief scale: Evidence for the existence of four different approaches toward religion in Flanders-Belgium”. Psychologica Belgica 40: 153–181.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.961   Google Scholar

Edwards Jeffrey R., Caplan Robert D., Harrison Van Richard. 1998. Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. W Theories of Organizational Stress. Red. Carry Cooper, 28–67. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198522799.003.0003   Google Scholar

Ferguson Neil, Binks Eve. „Understanding radicalization and engagement in terrorism through religious conversion motifs.” Journal of Strategic Security 8 (1-2): 16–26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.8.1.1430   Google Scholar

Goetz Nicolas, Wald Andreas. 2021. „Employee performance in temporary organizations: The effects of person‐environment fit and temporariness on task performance and innovative performance”. European Management Review 18 (2): 25–41.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12438   Google Scholar

Gooren Henri. 2010. Religious conversion and disaffiliation: Tracing patterns of change in faith practices. New York: Springer.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113039   Google Scholar

Granqvist Pehr. 2003. „Attachment theory and religious conversions: A review and a resolution of the classic and contemporary paradigm chasm”. Review of Religious Research 45 (2): 172–187.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3512581   Google Scholar

Halama Peter, Laćna Maria. 2011. „Personality change following religious conversion: Perceptions of converts and their close acquaintances”. Mental Health, Religion and Culture 14 (8): 757–768.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2010.522564   Google Scholar

Hoogland Aasha I. 2015. „Continuity of change: The dynamic of beliefs, values, and the aging experience”. Journal of Aging Studies 32: 32–39.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.12.004   Google Scholar

Hunsberger Bruce, Brown Luke. 1984. „Religious socialization, apostasy, and the impact of family background”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 23 (4): 462–475.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1386039   Google Scholar

Hutsebaut D. 1996. “Post-Critical Belief: A new approach of the religious attitude problem”. Journal of Empirical Theology 9: 48–66.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157092596X00132   Google Scholar

Kristof Amy L. 1996. „Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications”. Personnel Psychology 49 (1): 1–49.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x   Google Scholar

Kristof-Brown Amy L., Zimmerman Ryan D., Johnson Erin C. 2005. „Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit”. Personnel Psychology 58 (2): 281–342.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x   Google Scholar

Lee Kibeom, Ashton Michael C., Griep Yannick, Edmonds Michael. 2018. „Personality, religion, and politics: An investigation in 33 countries”. European Journal of Personality 32 (2): 100-115.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2142   Google Scholar

Leong Frederick T. L., Kalibatseva Zornitsa. 2011. Cross-cultural barriers to mental health services in the United States. Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on Brain Science.
  Google Scholar

Lewin Kurt. 1936. Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10019-000   Google Scholar

Malka Ariel, Lelkes Yphtach, Srivastava Sanjay, Cohen Adam B., Miller Dale T.. 2012. „The association of religiosity and political conservatism: The role of political engagement”. Political Psychology 33 (2): 275–299.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00875.x   Google Scholar

Namini Sussan, Appel Claudia, Jürgensen Ralph, Murken Sebastian. 2010. „How is Well‐Being Related to Membership in New Religious Movements? An Application of Person–Environment Fit Theory”. Applied Psychology 59 (2): 181–201.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00377.x   Google Scholar

Namini Sussan, Murken Sebastian. 2009. „Self-chosen involvement in new religious movements (NRMs): Well-being and mental health from a longitudinal perspective”. Mental Health, Religion and Culture 12 (6): 561–585.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670902897618   Google Scholar

Paloutzian Raymond F., Murken Sebastian, Streib Heinz, Röβler-Namini Sussan. 2013. Conversion, deconversion, and spiritual transformation: A multilevel interdisciplinary view. W Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. Red. Raymond F. Paloutzian, Crystal L. Park, 399–421. New York and London: The Guilford Press.
  Google Scholar

Pargament Kenneth I., Mahoney Annette. 2005. Discovering and conserving the sacred. W Handbook of positive psychology. Red. Rick C. Snyder, Shane J. Lopez, 646–659. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195135336.003.0047   Google Scholar

Parks-Leduc Laura, Feldman Gilad, Bardi Anat. 2015. „Personality traits and personal values: A meta-analysis." Personality and Social Psychology Review 19 (1): 3–29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314538548   Google Scholar

Poling Tommy H., Kenney Frank J.. 1986. The Hare Krishna character type: A study in sensate personality. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
  Google Scholar

Pusztai Gabriella, Demeter-Karászi Zsuzsanna. 2019. „Analysis of religious socialization based on interviews conducted with young adults”. Religions 10 (6): 1–10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10060365   Google Scholar

Robert R. Mccrae. 1999. „Mainstream personality psychology and the study of religion”. Journal of Personality 67 (6): 1209-1218.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00088   Google Scholar

Roberts Brent W., Yoon Hee J. 2022. „Personality psychology”. Annual Review of Psychology 73: 489–516.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114927   Google Scholar

Roccas Sonia, Sagiv Lilach, Schwartz Shalom H., Knafo Ariel. 2002. „The Big Five personality factors and personal values”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (2002): 789–801.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008   Google Scholar

Saud Muhammad, Ashfaq Asia, Abbas Ansar, Mahmood Qaisar Khalid. 2020. Seeking social support through Religion, Psychological wellbeing and Social capital: A Global Survey on Coronavirus situational stress and coping strategies. (25.04.2023). https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-67434/v1_covered.pdf?c=1631841135.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-67434/v1   Google Scholar

Sergio DellaPergola. 2017. „Jewish out-marriage: A global perspective”. W Jewish intermarriage around the world. Red. Sergio DellaPergola, Shulamit Reinharz, 13–39. London and New York: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203787991-2   Google Scholar

Snook Daniel W., Williams Michael J., Horgan John G. 2019. „Issues in the sociology and psychology of religious conversion”. Pastoral Psychology 68: 223–240.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-018-0841-1   Google Scholar

Stark Rodney. 1996. „Why religious movements succeed or fail: A revised general model”. Journal of Contemporary Religion 11 (2): 133–146.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13537909608580764   Google Scholar

Szabolcs Kéri, Christina Sleiman. 2017. „Religious conversion to Christianity in Muslim refugees in Europe.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 39 (3): 283–294.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15736121-12341344   Google Scholar

Szydłowski Piotr. (2018). „Dominant styles of thinking about religion”. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 10 (1): 94–101.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000153   Google Scholar

Taylor, Lynne. (2021). „A multidimensional approach to understanding religious conversion”. Pastoral Psychology 70 (1): 33–51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-020-00934-1   Google Scholar

Thibault Helene. 2021. “Are You Married?”: Gender and faith in political ethnographic research”. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 50 (3): 395–416.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241620986852   Google Scholar

Timol Riyaz. 2020. „Ethno-religious socialisation, national culture and the social construction of British Muslim identity”. Contemporary Islam 14 (3): 331–360.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-020-00454-y   Google Scholar

Verkplanken Bas, Orbell Sheina. 2022. „Attitudes, habits, and behavior change”. Annual Review of Psychology 73: 327–352.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-011744   Google Scholar

Luckmann Thomas. 2023. The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. New York: Taylor & Francis.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003257875   Google Scholar


Veröffentlicht
2023-12-28

##plugins.themes.libcom.cytowania##

Krok, D., & Olecká, I. . (2023). Psychosocial determinants of religious/denominational conversion: a person–environment fit perspective. Studia Oecumenica, 23, 297–314. https://doi.org/10.25167/so.5117

Authors

Dariusz Krok 

Authors

Ivana Olecká 

Statistics

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.


Lizenz

Copyright (c) 2024 Studia Oecumenica

Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International.

Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Studia Oecumenica

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0

Licencja oraz prawa autorskie autorzy przekazują wydawcy, którym jest Redakcji Wydawnictw WT UO.