Text style variations from the educational perspective

Jolanta Nocoń



Abstract

The article presents the results of an educational diagnosis. The study it describes analyses the style of invitations prepared by the Polish middle school pupils and its significant variation despite the fact that the subjects did identical tasks in identical conditions. The author is interested in the pupils’ awareness of style, which is why the study analyses only the texts whose writers have made a deliberate and conscious choice of stylistic models. The diversity of style has turned out to be the most pronounced on the level of register, and the main reason behind the style variation among the texts was rooted in the clash between opposing stylistic systems (formality vs. informality) and the overlapping of several discourses: the school, internet and colloquial discourse. The pupils have shown much creativity, choosing one of the three strategies to cope with the paradoxes of style designed by the authors of the task. None of the variants of style employed by the pupils in their invitations can be judged as incorrect or artificial. In such a situation, the basic category evaluating the style of

Keywords:

invitation, genre style, style variation, text production competence

Gajda S., 1982, Podstawy badań stylistycznych nad językiem naukowym, Warszawa–Wrocław.
  Google Scholar

Kita M., 2006, Komunikacja między generacjami w perspektywie stylowej, „Stylistyka”, XV, s. 295–317.
  Google Scholar

Krauz M., 2004, Tekst zaproszenia: wzorzec gatunkowy i jego przeobrażenia. – Gatunki mowy i ich ewolucja. T. II: Tekst a gatunek, red. D. Ostaszewska, Katowice, s. 169–179.
  Google Scholar

Markowski A., red., 1999, Nowy słownik poprawnej polszczyzny PWN, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Saloni Z., 1974, Tzw. pisma użytkowe w wyższych klasach szkoły podstawowej i w liceum. Poradnik metodyczny, wyd. 3, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Skudrzyk A., Warchala J., 2013, Język potoczny – dyskurs potoczny. – Style współczesnej polszczyzny. Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, red. E. Malinowska, J. Nocoñ, U. Żydek-Bednarczuk, Kraków, s. 35–59.
  Google Scholar

Wilkoń A., 2000, Typologia odmian współczesnej polszczyzny, wyd. 2, Katowice.
  Google Scholar

Wiśniewska H., 2016, Schematyzm działań dydaktycznych przyczyną niskiej sprawności pragmatycznej (na przykładzie opisów szkolnych). – H. Wiśniewska, Wokół edukacji polonistycznej w szkole. Teoria i praktyka, wybór i oprac. M. Karwatowska, L. Tymiakin, Lublin, s. 279–289.
  Google Scholar

Wiśniewska H., Karwatowska M., 1998, O typowości tekstów uczniowskich. – Tekst.Analizy i interpretacje, red. J. Bartmiński, B. Boniecka, Lublin, s. 255–266.
  Google Scholar

Witosz B., 1999, Czy gatunek i styl są we współczesnej stylistyce pojęciami konkurencyjnymi?, „Stylistyka”, VIII, s. 37–52.
  Google Scholar

Witosz B., 2006, Potoczność jako wartość w dzisiejszej kulturze, „Stylistyka”, XV, s. 37–48.
  Google Scholar

Wojtak M., 2001, Pragmatyczne aspekty analiz stylistycznych tekstów użytkowych. – Stylistyka a pragmatyka, red. B. Witosz, Katowice, s. 38–47.
  Google Scholar

Wolański A., 2008, Siedem kanonów stylu komunikatywnego, czyli jak pisać, by czytano nas chętnie i powszechnie. – Podstawy stylistyki i retoryki, red. A. Wolański, E. Wierzbicka, D. Zdunkiewicz-Jedynak, Warszawa, s. 7–38.
  Google Scholar

Żydek-Bednarczuk U., 2013, Dyskurs internetowy. – Style współczesnej polszczyzny. Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, red. E. Malinowska, J. Nocoń, U. Żydek-Bednarczuk, Kraków, s. 347–379.
  Google Scholar


Published
2020-01-10

Cited by

Nocoń, J. (2020). Text style variations from the educational perspective. Stylistyka, 27, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka27.2018.7

Authors

Jolanta Nocoń 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.