Three levels of structure and composition in the oracles against Egypt

The Book of Ezekiel chapters 29 through 32 in light of Hebrew rhetoric

Jerzy Bosowski

Wydział Teologiczny UO
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8138-6595

Abstract

The context of the research was that different commentators on the Book of Ezekiel propose different structures for the texts under study. Most of them worked (still work) with diachronic methods. Typically, these authors arrange the verses into groups and give titles to these groups. Therefore, the aim of the research became to discover structures based on the verses of the biblical text. It is then possible to identify the specific verses (or parts of verses, headings) that the ancient inspired author used. Therefore, the method of biblical Hebrew rhetoric was applied, which has 3 stages: bottom-up analysis, top-down analysis and theological interpretation. As a result of the research at the first two stages, it was discovered that the texts of the oracles against Egypt in the Book of Ezekiel are written in structures. Both at the level of bottom-up and top-down analysis. These texts can be read linearly (line by line), but they can also be read by members (A + A', B + B'...) and this makes sense. The third level of structure is an analysis of the 4 chapters (29‒32) of the Book of Ezekiel, which contain the oracles against Egypt. The conclusion, as can be drawn from the study, is that Ezekiel did not write oracles against Egypt. Ezekiel composed these oracles into 2 systems of 3 oracles each. In the first system, the destructor of Egypt is the king of Babylonia (parallel structures), In the second system, the destructor of Egypt is God (parallel-concentric structures). The inclusion that binds the whole oracle together is the double-seven number system, occurring in the first and last oracle.

Keywords:

Book of Ezekiel, Ezekiel, oracles against Egypt, Hebrew rhetoric, synthetic parallelism, synonymous parallelism, antithetical parallelism, parallel structures, parallel-centered structures, parallel compositions, mirror compositions

Bosak, P. C., Leksykon wszystkich miejsc biblijnych (Kraków 2016).
  Google Scholar

Bosowski, J., „Gli oracoli di distruzione contro l’Egitto Ez 29–32 alla luce della retorica ebraica”, Studi del settimo convegno RBS (ed. F. Graziano – R. Meynet – B. Witek; International Studies on Biblical & Semitic Rhetoric; Leuven – Paris – Bristol [CT] 2021) XXX 81–100, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1q26zkc.8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1q26zkc.8   Google Scholar

Bosowski, J., „Wyrocznie przeciw Egiptowi (Ez 29–32) przez pryzmat retoryki hebrajskiej”, Zeszyty Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Biblistów Polskich 19 (2022) 459–469.
  Google Scholar

Bosowski, J., Wyrocznie przeciw Egiptowi Ez 29–32 w świetle retoryki hebrajskiej (Opole 2019).
  Google Scholar

Cylkow, I. (ed.), Księga Ezechiela (Kraków 2010).
  Google Scholar

Czerski, J., Apokalipsa Świętego Jana: wstęp i komentarz. Cz. 1. Ap 1–3 (Opole 2018).
  Google Scholar

Czerski, J., „Hebrajska retoryka biblijna”, Izrael i Biblia Hebrajska w Nowym Testamencie (ed. K. Ziaja; Sympozja 53; Opole 2003) 9–17.
  Google Scholar

Edycja Świętego Pawła, Pismo Święte Starego i Nowego Testamentu: najnowszy przekład z języków oryginalnych z komentarzem (Biblia dla Rodziny; Częstochowa 2013).
  Google Scholar

Jasiński, A. S., Księga Proroka Ezechiela. Nowy Komentarz. Ez 16–20 (Opole 2018) V.
  Google Scholar

Jasiński, A. S., Księga Proroka Ezechiela. Nowy Komentarz. Ez 26–30 (Opole 2019) VII.
  Google Scholar

Jasiński, A. S., Księga Proroka Ezechiela. Nowy Komentarz. Ez 31–35 (Opole 2020) VIII.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/vv.4729   Google Scholar

Klugman, A., Nowy słownik polsko-hebrajski, hebrajsko-polski (Warszawa 1993).
  Google Scholar

Koehler L. – Baumgartner W.– Stamm J. J., Wielki słownik hebrajsko-polski i aramejsko-polski Starego Testamentu (ed. P. Dec; Prymasowska Seria Biblijna; Warszawa 22013) I.
  Google Scholar

Meynet, R., „Binarność, podstawowa cecha języka biblijnego”, Język Biblii a język współczesny. Praca zbiorowa (Kraków 2006) 11‒22.
  Google Scholar

Meynet, R., „Terminologia specjalistyczna” (2021) https://www.retoricabiblicaesemitica.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/4_Terminology_Polski_21.05.18.pdf.
  Google Scholar

Rumianek, R., „Księga Ezechiela”, Prorocy. Hebrajsko-polski Stary Testament. Przekład interlinearny z kodami gramatycznymi, transliteracją i indeksem słów hebrajskich (ed. A. Kuśmirek; Prymasowska Seria Biblijna; Warszawa 2008).
  Google Scholar

Smith, C. G., „Nile River | Delta, Map, Basin, Length, Facts, Definition, Map, History, & Location | Britannica” https://www.britannica.com/place/Nile-River [dostęp październik 1, 2022].
  Google Scholar

Strong, J., Hebrajsko-polski i aramejsko-polski słownik Stronga z lokalizacją słów hebrajskich i aramejskich oraz kodami Baumgartnera (Prymasowska Seria Biblijna; Warszawa 2017).
  Google Scholar


Published
2023-05-24

Cited by

Bosowski, J. (2023). Three levels of structure and composition in the oracles against Egypt: The Book of Ezekiel chapters 29 through 32 in light of Hebrew rhetoric. Scriptura Sacra, (26). https://doi.org/10.25167/ScrS/5035

Authors

Jerzy Bosowski 
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8138-6595

Jerzy Bosowski – doctor of theological sciences in biblical theology. Doctoral thesis with the title: “Oracles against Egypt Ez 29–32 in the light of Hebrew rhetoric”, defended at the Faculty of Theology of Opole University in 2019. Member of the Society of Polish Biblical Scholars (SBP 365). Areas of research: biblical Hebrew rhetoric as found in the Old and New Testaments, the Book of Ezekiel.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8138-6595



Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2023 Scriptura Sacra

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>