When your friend passes away... A profile recollections. A case study

Maria Wojtak

Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4537-2732

Abstract

The subject of the analysis is a specific utterance realising the poetics of the profile of recollection. The author of the utterance refers to the convention of the genre only in the framework of the text. He uses a variety of concepts in the main segment, adding the general shape of a letter with elements of memories, vita and biography to the statement. The originality of expression, however, is determined by references to other genres adopting the nature of genre copies. In the early passages of the utterance, a funeral oration emerges from the obituary form, and in further parts reviews and other forms of critical literary discourse are filtered through the remembrances. The stylistics of utterance diversifies and enriches epistolary conventions as well asothermanners of a monologue into a dialogic utterance.

Keywords:

genre, utterance, profile, style, recollection, memory

Bulisz E., 2014, Ku pamięci – nienekrologicznie, „Acta Humana”, z. 5, s. 197–209.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/ah.2014.5.197   Google Scholar

Doroszewski W. (red.), ROK, Słownik języka polskiego, t. 9, M-CE WYD., s. 1315.
  Google Scholar

Iwańczyk P., 2016, „Wchodził na boisko i stawał się geniuszem” – nawiązania do konwencji gatunkowej sylwetki-wspomnienia w felietonach z tygodnika „Piłka Nożna” z lat 1995–2008. – Język i sport, red. A. Czapla, M. Koper, Lublin, s. 61–78.
  Google Scholar

Kacprzak A., 2002, Palimpsesty słowne w języku mediów. – Tekst w mediach, red. K. Michalewski, Łódź, s. 46–52.
  Google Scholar

Kawka M., 2001, Biogram jako gatunek tekstu, „Język Polski”, z. 5, s. 325–330.
  Google Scholar

Kita M., 2013, Dyskurs prasowy. – Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej. Odmiany współczesnej polszczyzny, red. E. Malinowska, J. Nocoń, U. Żydek-Bednarczuk, Kraków, s. 251–252.
  Google Scholar

Wojtak M., 2003, Wyznaczniki gatunkowe sylwetki prasowej, „Stylistyka”, XII, s. 259–????.
  Google Scholar

Wojtak M., 2004, Gatunki prasowe, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Wojtak M., 2015, Gdy „między” jest w środku, czyli o przenikaniu się konwencji gatunkowych w konkretnych tekstach (na przykładzie przekazów prasowych). – Gatunki mowy i ich ewolucja, t. 5: Gatunek a granice, red. D. Ostaszewska, J. Przyklenk, Katowice, s. 82–93.
  Google Scholar

Worsowicz M., 2008, Sylwetka-wspomnienie, czyli między tradycją a nowoczesnością tekstu dziennikarskiego. – Wypowiedź dziennikarska. Teoria i praktyka, red. B. Bogołębska, A. Kudra, Łódź, s. 65–79.
  Google Scholar

Zielińska K., 2018, Pamięć w wymiarze multimodalnym – strategie upamiętniania na przykładzie polskich i niemieckich zapowiedzi internetowych. – Pamięć w ujęciu lingwistycznym. Zagadnienia teoretyczne i metodyczne, red. W. Czachur, Warszawa, s. 218–243.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323530077.pp.218-243   Google Scholar


Published
2020-01-10

Cited by

Wojtak, M. (2020). When your friend passes away. A profile recollections. A case study. Stylistyka, 28, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka28.2019.9

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.


Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>