Domosławski – bohater czy bluźnierca? Krytykowanie w polsko-niemieckim dyskursie na podstawie tytułów artykułów prasowych

Anna Hanus




Abstract

The power of language seems to come to the fore, especially in the media world in all its gradations. This paper discuses Polish-German headlines in press discourse concerning the scandalous biography Kapuœciñski non-fiction, with the aim to investigate the degree of explicitness in expressing criticism with the use of negative judgemental illocutions.

The basis for the text-linguistic analysis is the illocution structural analysis method developed further by H. Lenk and adapted to analysing press headlines. 

The article examines the usefullness of this method, pointing out its advantages and shortcomings, as well as other aspects, which can be meaningful while analysing the
headlines.

Keywords:

criticising, illocution structural analysis method, press headlines analysis, Kapuściński, Domosławski, Kapuściński non-fiction

Das große Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache, 1999, Bd. 1–10, hrsg. von der Dudenredaktion, Mannheim u.a.

Der kleine Duden: Deutsches Wörterbuch, 1982, hrsg. von der Dudenredaktion, Mannheim u.a.

Der kleine Wahrig. Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache, 1997, Gütersloh–München.

Deutsches Universalwörterbuch, 2001, hrsg. von der Dudenredaktion, Mannheim u.a.

Dietz G., 1995, Titel wissenschaftlicher Texte, Tübingen.

Di Meola C., 1998, Zur Syntax und Semantik von Schlagzeilen in der deutschsprachigen Tagespresse, „Muttersprache”, 108, s. 217–231.

Dubisz S. (red.), 2003, Uniwersalny słownik języka polskiego, Warszawa.

Dunaj B. (red.), 1996, Słownik współczesnego języka polskiego, Warszawa.

Foucault M., 1977, Archeologia wiedzy, Warszawa.

Genette G., 1992, Paratexte. Das Buch vom Beiwerk des Buches, Frankfurt/M.–New
York.

Hellwig P., 1994, Titulus oder Über den Zusammenhang von Titeln und Texten. Titel sind ein Schlüssel zur Textkonstitution „ZGL”, 12, s. 1–20.

Lenk H.E.H., 2003, Das Verständnis von Bewertungsausdrücken durch Fremd- und MuttersprachlerInnen. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung. – Lexikon und Verstehen, Hrsg. M. Skog-Södersved, M. Enell, B. Faber, Vaasa.

Lenk H.E.H., 2005, Funktionen des Texttitels in Deutschschweizer Zeitungskommentaren. – Entwicklungen und Innovationen in der Regionalpresse, Hrsg. H.-H. Lüger, F. Hammer,. Landau.

Nord Ch., 1993, Einführung in das funktionale Übersetzen: am Beispiel von Titeln und Überschriften, Tübingen.

Pollack, 2010, Die Stunde der kleinen Reporter. Ein paar Worte zu Artur Domosławskiund seiner umstrittenen Ryszard Kapuściński-Biografie, http://derstandard.at/1268402678335/Polen.

Puzynina J., 1992, Język wartości, Warszawa.

Sandig B., 1979, Ausdrucksmöglichkeiten des Bewertens. Ein Beschreibungsrahmen im Zusammenhang eines fiktionalen Textes „Deutsche Sprache”, 7, s. 137–159.

Skorupka S., Auderska H., Łempicka Z. (red.), 1969, Mały słownik języka polskiego, Warszawa.

Sobol E. (red.), 2001, Popularny słownik języka polskiego, Warszawa.

Szymczak M., Szkiłądź H., Bik S., Szkiłądź, C., Chocimska H., Krajewska M. (red.), 1993, Słownik języka polskiego, Warszawa.

Zhong L., 1995, Bewerten in literarischen Rezensionen Linguistische Untersuchungen zu Bewertungshandlungstypen, Buchframe, Bewertungsmaßstäben und bewertenden Textstrukturen, Frankfurt/M.–Berlin–Bern–New York–Paris–Wien.

Żydek-Bednarczuk U., 2005, Wprowadzenie do lingwistycznej analizy tekstu, Katowice.

Zillig W., 1982, Bewerten. Sprechakttypen der bewertenden Rede, Tübingen.

Published
2019-12-28

Cited by

Hanus, A. (2019). Domosławski – bohater czy bluźnierca? Krytykowanie w polsko-niemieckim dyskursie na podstawie tytułów artykułów prasowych. Stylistyka, 22, 177–196. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/1672

Authors

Anna Hanus 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2013 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.