Univerbizované názvy institucí – stylová hodnota, expresivita a vhodnost jejich užití z hlediska jazykové kultury

Ivana Kolářová




Abstract

The names of institutions in the Czech language are:
– multi-word lexeme/collocation: prùmyslová škola, úøad práce;
– one-word lexeme – primary derivates: ohlašovna, knihovna;
– “univerbizates“ – words formed by fusion of multi-word lexeme: prùmyslová škola, úøad práce (multi-word lexemes) – prùmyslovka, pracák (univerbizates).
Names of institutions that are formed as univerbizates, are almost stylistically marked. They are stylistically differentiated: some of them are standard (devítiletka, jednotøídka), others are slightly substandard – colloquial (prùmyslovka, akciovka) or more substandard – slangy: uèòák, beròák, dìcák.
The process of derivation of univerbizates is not so varied as derivation of the primary derivates. Most univerbizates – names of institutions are formed by several suffixes: -ka, -ák, rarely by suffixes -áè, -da, -árna. There are only substantive univerbizates and probably no adjectival, verbal or adverbial univerbizates. The word-forming of univerbizates is quite conservative compared to the word-forming of other words in Czech.

Keywords:

univerbizates, multi-word lexeme, stylistic value, adequacy using, cultured speech

Čechová M., Krèmová M., Minářová E., 2008, Současná stylistika, Praha.

Daneš F., 1967, Obecné názvy míst. – Dokulil, M. a kol. Tvoření slov v češtinì 2. Odvozování podstatných jmen, Praha, s. 434–476.

Dokulil M., 1962, Tvoření slov v češtinì 1. Teorie odvozování slov, Praha.

Dokulil M., 1982, K otázce slovnìdruhových převodù a přechodù, zvláštì transpozice. „Slovo a slovesnost“ 43, s. 257–271

Hebal-Jezierska M., 2008, Výzkum morfologické variantnosti prostřednictvím ÈNK. – Grammar & Corpora. Gramatika a korpus 2007, eds. F. Štícha, M. Fried, Praha, s. 345–351.

Hubáèek J., 2003, Výbìrový slovník českých slangù, Ostrava.

Chloupek J., 1986, Dichotomie spisovnosti a nespisovnosti, Brno.

Jedlièka A., 1969, Univerbizace a multiverbizace v pojmenovávacích strukturách, „Slavica Pragensia“ 11, s. 93–101.

Karlík P., Nekula M., Pleskalová J. a kol., 2002, Encyklopedický slovník češtiny, Praha.

Prošek M., 2005, O jednom typu univerbizovaných pojmenování míst na -ák, „Naše řeè“ 88, s. 57–66.

Slovník spisovného jazyka českého I–VIII, 1989, Praha.

Sochová Z., 1966, K slovotvorné a stylotvorné charakteristice mluveného jazyka, „Naše řeè“ 49, s. 81–87.

Szczepańska E., 1994, Uniwerbizacja w języku czeskim i polskim, Kraków.

Štícha F., 2008, Usage, frequency, and grammaticality. – Grammar & Corpora. Gramatika a korpus 2007, eds. F. Štícha, M. Fried, Praha, s. 285–291.

Štícha F., 2012, Tvoření slov. – Gramatika češtiny, ed. F. Štícha, Praha (v tisku).

Tìšitelová M., 1967, Útvary předponové. – Dokulil M. a k

Published
2019-12-28

Cited by

Kolářová , I. (2019). Univerbizované názvy institucí – stylová hodnota, expresivita a vhodnost jejich užití z hlediska jazykové kultury. Stylistyka, 22, 213–232. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/1701

Authors

Ivana Kolářová  

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2013 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.


Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>