The US–THEM opposition in Maria Pawlikowska-Jasnorzewska’s notes of 1939–1945

Anna Wojciechowska



Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the US–THEM opposition (which is important in the study of the linguistic image of the world) in a particular autobiographical statement, that is, in the notes of Maria Pawlikowska-Jasnorzewska written during the years 1939–1945. After the reconstruction of the image of her family, countrymen, and foreigners captured in the text, one may conclude that the boundaries between the US–THEM categories seem to blur. Thus, the US–THEM status is not constant. It is important to emphasise that the choice of specific markers of foreignness and closeness is strictly related to the author’s value-system. It can be seen from the data that the US comprises a small circle of people, to whom she is bound, and who share similar ways of perceiving the world, and who give her a sense of security. The THEM, on the other hand, are those people with whom the poet is unable to communicate – in the literal and metaphorical sense. The analysis also allow to see the influence of external conditions on the author’s various style choices. The text is strongly marked by subjectivity and reveals emotional and evaluative attitude of the speaking subject towards the reality presented. It is due to the use of such stylistic devices as: emotionally coloured lexicon, metaphors containing evaluating elements, code-switching, interjections, etc.

Keywords:

Maria Pawlikowska-Jasnorzewska, US–THEM opposition, autobiographical statement, linguistic image of the world

Awdiejew A., 1983, Klasyfikacja funkcji pragmatycznych, „Polonica”, IX, s. 53–85.
  Google Scholar

Awdiejew A., 1987, Pragmatyczne podstawy interpretacji wypowiedzeń, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Bartmiński J., 2007, Opozycja swój / obcy a problem językowego obrazu świata, „Etnolingwistyka”, 19, s. 35–59.
  Google Scholar

Bartmiński J., 2012, Językowe podstawy obrazu świata, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Benedyktowicz Z., 2000, Portrety „obcego”. Od stereotypu do symbolu, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Chlebda W., 2007, Kiedy swój staje się obcym, „Etnolingwistyka”, 19, s. 89–98.
  Google Scholar

Czermińska M., 2005, Autor – podmiot – osoba. Fikcjonalność i niefikcjonalność. – Polonistyka w przebudowie, t. 1, red. M. Czermińska i in., Kraków, s. 211–223.
  Google Scholar

Grabias S., 1981, O ekspresywności języka, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Grabias S., 1994, Język w zachowaniach społecznych, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Lemann N., 2006, Dziennik. – Słownik rodzajów i gatunków literackich, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Makuchowska M., 1994, Rytualizacja i spontaniczność w języku modlitwy, „Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne”, 3, s. 83–89.
  Google Scholar

Nowak P., 2002, SWOI i OBCY w językowym obrazie świata. Język publicystyki polskiej z pierwszej połowy lat pięćdziesiątych, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Pawlikowska-Jasnorzewska M., 2012, Wojnę szatan spłodził. Zapiski 2939–1945, zebrał R. Podraza, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Perlin J., Milewska M., 2000, Afektonimy w polskim, francuskim, hiszpańskim i niderlandzkim. Analiza morfologiczna i semantyczna. – Język a kultura, t. 14: Uczucia w języku i tekście, red. I. Nowakowska-Kempna, A. Dąbrowska, J. Anusiewicz, Wrocław, s. 165–173.
  Google Scholar

Puzynina J., 1992, Język wartości, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Samozwaniec M., 2012, Zalotnica niebieska, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Sławiński J. (red.), 2000, Słownik terminów literackich, Wrocław.
  Google Scholar

Witosz B., 2009, Dyskurs i stylistyka, Katowice.
  Google Scholar

Znaniecki F., 1990, Studium nad antagonizmem do obcych. – Tenże, Współczesne narody, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar


Published
2019-12-29

Cited by

Wojciechowska, A. (2019). The US–THEM opposition in Maria Pawlikowska-Jasnorzewska’s notes of 1939–1945. Stylistyka, 24, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka.24.2015.12

Authors

Anna Wojciechowska 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2015 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.