Lexical Devices and the Style of the New Czech Literature

Petr Mareš

Uniwersytet Karola w Pradze

Abstract

The paper deals with the complexity of stylistic markers of words and with the employment of these markers for aesthetic purposes and effects in several works of modern Czech literature. There is a distinctive tendency in the Czech prose to combine lexical devices with dissimilar, often antagonistic stylistic markers (formal and colloquial, archaic and new, polite and vulgar etc.). The main part of the paper includes short analyses of selected texts that operate with lexical devices in such a way. In 1920s, Vladislav Vanèura was a pioneer of this stylistic technique. In the last decades, novels and short stories by Ota Pavel, Jiøí Gruša or Petra Hùlová represent outstanding examples of achieving significant effects by contrasting words with antagonistic stylistic markers.

Keywords:

archaism, colloquialism, lexical devices, literary text, poetism, stylistic markers, vulgarism

Čechová M., Krčmová M., Minářová E., 2008, Současná stylistika, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Fišer Z., 1994, Dotazník aneb modlitba za jedno město a přítele. – Slovník české prózy 1945–1994, Dokoupil B., Zelinský M., eds., Ostrava, s. 93–95.
  Google Scholar

Homoláč J., Mrázková K., 2014, K stylistickému hodnocení jazykových prostředků, zvláště lexikálních, „Slovo a slovesnost“ 75, č. 1, s. 3–38.
  Google Scholar

Jedličková A., 1992, Ota Pavel: Smrt krásných srnců (1971). – Česká literatura 1945–1970. Interpretace vybraných děl, Praha, s. 411–422.
  Google Scholar

Kochová P., Opavská Z., 2016, Akademický slovník spisovné češtiny, „Naše řeč“ 99, č. 2, s. 57–83.
  Google Scholar

Kosková, H., 1996, Hledání ztracené generace, Jinočany.
  Google Scholar

Kožmín Z., 1968, Styl Vančurovy prózy, Brno.
  Google Scholar

Lišková M., 2013, Způsob označování stylové příznakovosti ve výkladovém slovníku, „Jazykovědné aktuality“ 50, č. 3 a 4, s. 154–158.
  Google Scholar

Lišková M., 2015, Problematika vymezení pojmů archaismus a historismus, „Jazykovědné aktuality“ 52, č. 3 a 4, s. 102–116.
  Google Scholar

Macurová A., 1981, Výstavba a smysl Vančurova Rozmarného léta, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Mareš P., 2012, Nejen jazykem českým. Studie o vícejazyčnosti v literatuře, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Mukařovský J., 1948, O jazyce básnickém (1940) – Mukařovský J., Kapitoly z české poetiky I, Praha, s. 78–128
  Google Scholar

Opavská Z., Kochová P., 2013, Stylistická charakteristika lexikálních jednotek v českých výkladových slovnících, „Jazykovědné aktuality“ 50, č. 3 a 4, s. 141–147.
  Google Scholar

Spitzmüller J., 2013, Graphische Variation als soziale Praxis. Eine soziolinguistische Theorie skripturaler ›Sichtbarkeit‹, Berlin – Boston.
  Google Scholar

Stich A., 1975, K obecné češtině v současné krásné próze (Ota Pavel), „Naše řeč“ 58, č. 4, s. 215–223.
  Google Scholar

Trávníček J., 1993, Jiří Gruša: Dotazník aneb Modlitba za jedno město a přítele (1975). – Holý J. a kol., Český Parnas. Literatura 1970–1990 (Interpretace vybraných děl 60 autorů). Praha, s. 102–107.
  Google Scholar


Published
2018-10-03

Cited by

Mareš, P. (2018). Lexical Devices and the Style of the New Czech Literature. Stylistyka, 26, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka26.2017.11

Authors

Petr Mareš 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.