Emocionalita a expresivita, kritika  a hodnocení v on-line sportovních přenosech  a v reakcích fanoušků

Jana Hoffmannová

doi:10.25167/Stylistyka30.2021.10

Emotionality and expressivity, critique and evaluation in live sports commentary and fan reactions

Jana Hoffmannová

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-8347

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka30.2021.10

Abstract

Emotions are an indelible part of both doing sport and watching sports events. The expression of them is one factor enabling the communicative sphere to fulfil its societal entertainment function. The research for the present paper is based on data from live sports commentaries and the accompanying Internet-based fans’ discussions, with the aim of indicating certain distinctions. Expressions of emotion differ between commentators and fans, and also depend on the relationship between these subjects, individual types of sporting events (national teams, club teams, the Olympics, World and European Championships, football Masters’ League or the European League, the tennis Fed Cup or Grand Slam tournaments, domestic football and hockey leagues), as well as critical situations (scoring or missing a goal, the final scores of the events, losing or winning matches). Significant features of electronic communication also contribute to the expression of emotions, with the varying profiles of individual Internet forums playing a role here, too. This high-profile emotionality leads to the use of both evaluative (positive and negative) and expressive means (including vulgarisms), not only linguistic, but also non-verbal ones

Keywords:

live text sports commentary, sports fan forums, emotions, evaluative and expressive means, vulgarisms

References

Bočák M., Mergeš J., Sasák P., 2019, Súčasný mediálny šport (Tri prieniky do fungovania športu v televízii), Prešov.
Google Scholar

Bühler K., 1934, Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache, Jena.
Google Scholar

Čmejrková S., 2019, Emoce v jazyce a komunikaci. – S. Čmejrková, Jazyk a dialog. Výbor z textů, Praha, s. 96–116.
Google Scholar

Daneš F., 1987, Kognitivnost a emocionálnost v promluvové interakci. Teze přednášky v JS v Praze dne 6. 11. 1986, „Jazykovědné aktuality“, 24, č. 1–2, s. 24–27.
Google Scholar

Daneš F., 1994, Involvement with language and in language, „Journal of Pragmatics“, 22, s. 251–264.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90111-2 Google Scholar

Daneš F., 2000, Cognition and emotion in discourse interaction: a preliminary survey of the field. – F. Daneš, Jazyk a text II, Praha, s. 210–224.
Google Scholar

Giulianotti R., 2002, Supporters, followers, fans and flaneurs. A taxonomy of spectator identities, „Football Journal of Sport and Social Issues“, 26, č. 1, s. 25–46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723502261003 Google Scholar

Hoffmannová J., 2018, On-line sportovní přenosy jako hybridní žánr, „Jazyk a kultúra“, 9, č. 35, s. 29–38.
Google Scholar

Hvížďala K., 2016, Mediální krajina v postfaktuální době: Pasti a šance. O úloze médií v demokratické společnosti, „Host“, 32, č. 7, s. 43–48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9785/cr-2016-0109 Google Scholar

Chovanec J., 2018, The Discourse of Online Sportscasting. Constructing Meaning and Interaction in Live Text Commentary, Amsterdam – Philadelphia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.297 Google Scholar

Jakobson R., 1960, Linguistics and Poetics. – Style in Language. Ed. T. Sebeok, Cambridge, Mass., s. 350–377.
Google Scholar

Kaderka P., 2010, Slovo a obraz, racionalita a emocionalita. – Užívání a prožívání jazyka. K 90. narozeninám Františka Daneše. Ed. S. Čmejrková, J. Hoffmannová, E. Havlová, Praha, s. 83–89.
Google Scholar

Kaeser E., 2016, Das postfaktische Zeitalter, „Neue Zürcher Zeitung“, 21. 8.
Google Scholar

Keyes R., 2004, The Post-Truth Era, New York.
Google Scholar

Klingová J., 2018, Emócie a emocionálnosť v mediálnej interakcii (so zameraním na jazyk mediálního športu), „Jazykovedný časopis“, 69, č. 2, s. 141–174.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2019-0002 Google Scholar

Krøvel R., Roksvold T. (eds.), 2012, We Love to Hate Each Other. Mediated Football Fan Culture, Göteborg.
Google Scholar

Lavric E., Pisek G., Skinner A., Stadler W. (eds.), 2008, The Linguistics of Football, Tübingen.
Google Scholar

Mergeš J., 2016, Textové stereotypy komentátorského prejavu v priamych TV prenosoch z futbalu, Prešov.
Google Scholar

Mrázková K., 2013, Emotivní funkce a lexikální expresivita v současné české publicistice. – K. Klímová, I. Kolářová, J. M. Tušková, I. Martinec, D. Kroča, Stylistika v kontextu historie a současnosti, Brno, s. 199–207.
Google Scholar

Müller T., 2007, Football, Language and Linguistics. Time-critical Utterances in Unplanned Spoken Language, Their Structures and Their Relation to Non-lin guistic Situations and Events, Tübingen.
Google Scholar

Orgoňová O., Bohunická A., 2018, Interakčná štylistika, Bratislava.
Google Scholar

Postman, N., 1999, Ubavit se k smrti. Veřejná komunikace ve věku zábavy, Praha (původní vydání Amusing Ourselves to Death, Viking Penguin 1985).
Google Scholar

Pražský lingvistický kroužek, 1970, Teze předložené Prvému sjezdu slovanských filologů v Praze 1929. – U základů pražské jazykovědné školy, ed. J. Vachek, Praha, s. 35–65.
Google Scholar

Roether D., 2018, Pociťovaná realita. Předneseno na Frankfurtském dnu online žurnalismu 25. 4. 2017; shrnutí přednášky zveřejněno na webu pražského Goe the-Institutu r. 2018, bez bližší datace: https://www.goethe.de/ins/cz/cs/kul/the/ktx/21446204.html [data dostępu: 6. 4. 2021].
Google Scholar

Slančová D., Slančová T., 2014, Reč pohybu, autority a súdržnosti, Prešov.
Google Scholar

Zima J., 1961, Expresivita slova v současné češtině, Praha.
Google Scholar

Download

pdf (Čeština)

Published

2021-12-27

Cited by

Hoffmannová, J. (2021). Emotionality and expressivity, critique and evaluation in live sports commentary and fan reactions. Stylistyka, 30, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka30.2021.10

Authors

Jana Hoffmannová
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-8347

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>