Dialog. Nové stylové podoby tradičního žánru

Abstract

The paper focuses on the characteristics of dialogue as a specific genre that already flourished in the antiquity and on the description of the style of selected Czech dialogues from the 20th and 21st centuries. The genre of dialogue (literary dialogue)
consists of written texts that simulate conversation between two (or more) interlocutors. In literary dialogues, the confrontation of presented considerations and statements is crucial for the constitution of their sense. As to functions, these dialogues are multiform; the aesthetic function is often combined with scientific or practical information, philosophical reflection, or persuasion. It is often claimed that the genreof dialogue has been neglected since the end of the 18th century. The aim of the
 second part of the paper is to instantiate that dialogues are also written in modern  times. Ten Czech dialogues from 1906 to 2022 are briefly analysed. These texts are built (sometimes playfully) upon the style and structure of classical dialoguesand adapted for  new purposes and the contemporary communication conditions.For instance, dialogues are used as an instrument for popular  enlightenment or for comparison of political conceptions

Keywords:

dialogue, genre, style, functions, reflection on tradition, confrontation of attitudes

Cardelle de Hartmann C., 2007, Lateinische Dialoge 1200-1400. Literaturhistorische Studie und Repertorium, Leiden – Boston: Brill.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004160330.i-826   Google Scholar

Červenka J., 2022, Literární dialogy a tolerance v české reformaci, Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
  Google Scholar

Föllinger S., Müller G. M. (eds.), 2013, Der Dialog in der Antike. Formen und Funktionen einer literarischen Gattung zwischen Philosophie, Wissensvermittlung und dramatischer Inszenierung, Berlin – Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110311945   Google Scholar

Heitsch D., Vallée J. F. (eds.), 2004, Printed Voices. The Renaissance Culture of Dialogue, Toronto – Buffalo – London: Toronto University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442678743   Google Scholar

Hirzel R., 1895, Der Dialog. Ein literarhistorischer Versuch I.-II., Leipzig: S. Hirzel.
  Google Scholar

Hlaváček L., 1978, Výtvarný teoretik Miroslav Míčko, „Estetika“, 15, č. 4, s. 222–239.
  Google Scholar

Hoffmannová J., 2016, Dialog. – Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny, ed. P. Karlík, M. Nekula, J. Pleskalová, Praha: NLN, s. 335-337,
  Google Scholar

https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/DIALOG (přístup: 05.12.2022).
  Google Scholar

Hoffmannová J., 2018, Dialog. – Slovník literárněvědného strukturalismu, ed. O. Sládek, Brno: Host, s. 135–143.
  Google Scholar

Hoffmannovi J. a B., 2015, Dialogické interpretace, Praha: Karolinum.
  Google Scholar

Janský K., 1967, Vzpomínka na Vojtěcha Jiráta [1948]. – V. Jirát, Duch a tvar, Praha: Československý spisovatel, s. 15–19.
  Google Scholar

Jirát V., 1967b, Obrozenské překlady Mozartova Dona Juana [1938]. – V. Jirát, Duch a tvar, Praha: Československý spisovatel, s. 227–257.
  Google Scholar

Jirát V., 1967c, Fragment zastřeného osudu [1945]. – V. Jirát, Duch a tvar, Praha: Československý spisovatel, s. 213–223.
  Google Scholar

Krejčí K., 1967, Torzo nedokončeného díla. – V. Jirát, Duch a tvar, Praha: Československý spisovatel, s. 299-313.
  Google Scholar

Kushner E., 1977, The Dialogue of the French Renaissance: Work of Art or Instrument of Inquiry?, „Zagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich“, 20, č. 2, s. 23–35.
  Google Scholar

Macek E., 1983, Vidina řádu. – M. Marten, Imprese a řád, Praha: Odeon, s. 119–146.
  Google Scholar

Mareš P., 1989, Styl, text, smysl: O slovesném díle Josefa Čapka, Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
  Google Scholar

Markiewicz H., 1983, Morfologia dialogu. Próba uporządkowania, „Dialog“, 28, č. 1, s. 111–117.
  Google Scholar

Marsh D., 1980, The Quattrocento Dialogue: Classical Tradition and Humanist Innovation, London – Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674180550   Google Scholar

Med, J., 2001, Česká symbolistně-dekadentní literatura. – Česká literatura na předělu století, ed. J. Janáčková, J. Hrabáková, Jinočany: H & H Vyšehradská, s. 43–92.
  Google Scholar

Merhaut L., 1994, Cesty stylizace (Stylizace, „okraj“ a mystifikace v české literatuře přelomu devatenáctého a dvacátého století), Praha: Ústav pro českou literaturu AV ČR.
  Google Scholar

Mukařovský J., 1948, Kapitoly z české poetiky I. Obecné věci básnictví, Praha: Svoboda.
  Google Scholar

Müllerová O., 2022, Dialog a mluvená čeština. Výbor z textů, Praha: NLN.
  Google Scholar

Opelík J., 1980, Josef Čapek, Praha: Melantrich.
  Google Scholar

Pujol S., 2005, Le Dialogue d’idées au dix-huitième siècle, Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.
  Google Scholar

Suitner R., 2022, The Dialogues of the Dead of the Early German Enlightenment, Leiden–Boston: Brill.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004465039   Google Scholar

Vojtěch D., 1996, Miloš Marten jako kritik, „Česká literatura“, 44, č. 4, s. 359–394.
  Google Scholar


Published
2024-03-06

Cited by

MAREŠ, P. (2024). Dialog. Nové stylové podoby tradičního žánru. Stylistyka, 32(32), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka32.2023.12

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.