##plugins.themes.libcom.datePublished##: 2025-08-07

Česká stylistika 1970–2020

JANA HOFFMANNOVÁ , PETR MAREŠ
Stylistyka
Sekcia: STYLISTYKA CZESKA Czech stylistics
DOI https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka35.2025.1

Abstrakt

The first part of the chapter presents an overview of the development of Czech stylistics after 1970. It draws attention to the important work of three Czech researchers: K. Hausenblas, M. Jelínek and A. Stich. It also mentions the reflection of the issue
of style by literature scholars (M. Červenka, M. Jankovič, Z. Kožmín). Concerning the period after 1989, attention is devoted to the rising number of synthetic works, the authors of which are J. V. Bečka, the collective of J. Chloupek, M. Čechová, M. Krčmová and E. Minářová, and the group led by J. Hoffmannová (J. Homoláč, E. Chvalovská, P. Kaderka, L. Jílková, P. Mareš, K. Mrázková). J. Hoffmannová’s
book Stylistika a…[Stylistics and…] (1997) was focused on searching for the position of stylistics in the interdisciplinary context, above all in relation to newer fields and approaches. As for the prominent features of stylistic research, among others, there is mention of the re-evaluation of the concept of functional styles (e.g. in favor of communicative spheres) and style-forming factors, turning the attention to the style characteristics of dialogues and spoken expression, the research on conversationalization and colloquialization in public communication and the growing heterogeneity of texts accompanying the development of electronic communication.
The chapter then devotes further attention to the individual spheres of communication. The sphere of everyday communication is characterized in relation to older concepts such as colloquial style, conversational style, colloquial Czech, and others. Emphasis is placed on the relationships between texts which are spoken (mainly dialogical ones) and those which are written (internet, social networks), which are currently increasing in number. – The sphere of institutional communication was previously associated above all with administrative style. Administrative texts havea close relationship to texts from the scholarly and advertising spheres; their form
is strikingly influenced by the asymmetry in the participant roles (especially in communication between institutions and citizens). – The sphere of expert communication is further differentiated into scholarly communication and practical specialized communication. Scholarly texts are characterized by the gradual transition from traditional forms of expression to Anglo-Saxon conventions. At the same time, the proportion of spoken characteristics and multimodality is increasing. – The sphere of media communication, spoken and written, is significantly influenced by the new affordances of the internet. This gains in importance due to the requirement of quick reactions to current events and the activity of the recipients, who obtain access to the media space (commentaries, discussions). An attempt to keep texts brief and transparent is being asserted, and colloquialization is utilized in their linguistic component. – For
texts from the sphere of advertising communication, informality, entertainment and multimodality are at the forefront; everything here is subordinate to the persuasive function, the attempt to gain and engage the interest of the addressees; politeness is integrated into manipulative strategies. – In the sphere of literary communication, observations are made regarding the extraordinary variation of expression, influenced, among others, by the relations between intratextual subjects: the use of various narrative means, the use of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd persons; the stylization of spoken language with various profiles (colloquialization); the intersection of literary
and electronic communication (blog novels, instapoetry and the like).

Najaktuálnejšie články rovnakého autora (rovnakých autorov)

1 2 3 > >> 
##plugins.themes.libcom.BOCookieBarText##